Our college football preview coverage continues with a look at the non-conference games being played by Power 5¬†teams this fall. This week, it’s the Pac-12.

The Pac-12, like the Big Ten and Big 12, only plays three non-conference games because its teams play nine conference games. The conference has several preseason College Football Playoff contenders, most notably Stanford and USC (though there are a few other dark horses, like Oregon).

Grading teams’ schedules is always a bit of a subjective art. After all, it would be foolish to expect Kansas to schedule the same teams as Alabama. A team expecting to be in the Playoff picture has to schedule better than a team who can’t even expect to make a bowl game. Also, I try to take into account when the game was scheduled as much as possible.

Just to review my format, I will grade each non-conference game that each team plays, with an explanation for that grade. Then I will grade the entirety of the non-conference schedule overall.

Pac-12 North Non-Conference Schedule Grades

California Golden Bears

Sept. 2, @North Carolina
The Tar Heels might have higher expectations than Cal coming into 2017, but this is still a home-and-home between two programs of relatively equal caliber. These are the games I love to see.
Grade: A+

Sept. 9, Weber State
I’m okay with one FCS game, especially when the rest of the schedule is this good.
Grade: F

Sept. 16, Ole Miss
The Rebels might be significantly better than Cal in recent years, but I won’t criticize a P5 team that plays other P5s in two of its three nonconference games.
Grade: A

Overall:
Two out of three games against P5s, and good ones at that? Cal might not be expected to be good this season, but it gets full props for this schedule.
Grade: A

Oregon Ducks

Sept. 2, Southern Utah
The Ducks start out with an FCS opponent. I’m not happy about it, but their other two games are good enough that I won’t complain too much.
Grade: F

Sept. 9, Nebraska
This is one of my favorite series currently scheduled. It’s two top-tier P5 teams playing a home-and-home. I love it.
Grade: A

Sept. 16, @Wyoming
Oregon is traveling to Laramie for a game it almost certainly expected to be a cakewalk when it was first scheduled. Craig Bohl has done an amazing job, though, and Wyoming might be one of the favorites in the Mountain West this year. All of a sudden, a road trip to Laramie doesn’t seem like such an easy win. Still, road game against a good Group of 5 team? Gets a good grade from me.
Grade: A-

Overall:
This is basically the schedule that I expect from good Power 5 teams that only play three nonconference games. One Power 5 of equal stature, one good Group of 5 team, and one cupcake. Nothing to complain about here, other than the fact that the cupcake is a FCS team and not a bad Group of 5 one.
Grade: A-

Oregon State Beavers

Aug. 26, @Colorado State
The Rams play at Hawaii this year, so the teams took the option to move their opening game up to “Week 0.” Still, I like the idea of a not-great Power 5 team playing a pretty good Group of 5 team on the road.
Grade: B+

Sept. 2, Portland State
It’s an FCS game. I’m okay with that right now.
Grade: F

Sept. 9, Minnesota
This is a good home-and-home between two programs that were at about equal strength when the games were scheduled. It’s what I love to see.
Grade: A

Overall:
Oregon State is a program in a bit of trouble right now, but they’re playing a schedule I like to see. One cupcake win, one decent Group of 5 team, and one decent P5 team.
Grade: A-

Stanford Cardinal

Aug. 26, vs Rice (in Australia)
Stanford is also playing Week 0 by traveling to Australia. While the concept is really cool, I wish they were playing someone much better than Rice.
Grade: D

Sept. 16, @San Diego State
This could be a recruiting trip to southern California for Stanford. Or it could be a great road game against one of the under-the-radar premier Group of 5 programs of this decade.
Grade: A

Nov. 25, Notre Dame
The Irish might have been disappointing last year, but this game is still a highlight on Stanford’s schedule.
Grade: A

Overall:
This is what I love. One cupcake (but against a poor FBS team, not an FCS one), one very good Group of 5 team, and one good P5 team. This is what all potential Playoff contenders should be playing.
Grade: A+

Washington Huskies

Sept. 1, @Rutgers
This home-and-home might have been good when it was scheduled. Washington was still a program in turmoil and Rutgers was still decent. My, how the tables have turned. Now Rutgers is an awful game for a Playoff contender to be playing.
Grade: C

Sept. 9, Montana
FCS team. No respect.
Grade: F

Sept. 16, Fresno State
Once upon a time, playing Fresno State would be a schedule boost. Now, though, the Bulldogs will probably be one of the worst teams in FBS.
Grade: D

Overall:
The Huskies are expected to be a Playoff contender. They’re certainly not scheduling like it, though. I honestly don’t know the toughest game on this nonconference slate; though it would only be throwing a small amount of shade at Rutgers to say that it’s Montana. The nonconference slate gets better next year, though. At least there’s that to look forward to.
Grade: D-

Washington State Cougars

Sept. 2, Montana State
Washington State starts with an FCS team. That hasn’t proven to be a smart decision in the past.
Grade: D

Sept. 9, Boise State
I absolutely consider scheduling a home-and-home with Boise State as a P5 game, at least in terms of schedule value. The Broncos might not be what they once were in the Kellen Moore glory days, but this is still a top program that has more risk than upside in scheduling.
Grade: A+

Sept. 23, Nevada
Nevada is a decent Mountain West program. It’s not a bad third team to schedule, but not a great one.
Grade: C+

Overall:
The Cougars play one great nonconference game (Boise State), one cupcake, and one not-bad Group of 5 team. This is a decent schedule for Mike Leach’s team.
Grade: B

About Yesh Ginsburg

Yesh has been a fan and student of college football since before he can remember. He spent years mastering the intricacies of the BCS and now keeps an eye on the national picture as teams jockey for College Football Playoff positioning.