Nolan Arenado argued his strike out and was ejected. Aug 24, 2022; Chicago, Illinois, USA; St. Louis Cardinals third baseman Nolan Arenado (28) reacts after being called out on strikes against the Chicago Cubs during the third inning at Wrigley Field. Mandatory Credit: David Banks-USA TODAY Sports

Wednesday’s game between the St. Louis Cardinals and Chicago Cubs featured a controversial moment. When the dust settled, St. Louis superstar third baseman Nolan Arenado had been ejected.

With the Cardinals trailing 3-0 in the top of the third inning, Arenado came up with two outs and two on. On a 3-2 pitch, Chicago pitcher Luke Farrell’s pitch was clearly outside. Arenado began to offer it but held up. He felt that he checked his swing. Home plate umpire John Libka disagreed and ruled that Arenado had gone around.

Arenado quickly argued the play. He got into Libka’s face and said a few words. As angry as he was, it seemed as though the incident would end there. But shortly after Arenado stopped arguing and turned away from Libka, the home plate umpire ejected him.

There are three issues at play here.

One is that pretty much everyone would like it if home plate umpires checked with the base umpires on check swings. The first base umpire (or third base umpire in the case of a left-handed hitter) has a much better vantage point on a check swing than the home plate umpire. Occasionally, a check swing will be obvious enough that the home plate umpire can make the call. This was not the case here — which brings us to issue No. 2.

By all appearances, Libka did not get the call right. Arenado appeared to check his swing.

Finally, the sequence of events following the strike call don’t put Libka in a good light.

If Arenado said one of the magic words, the ejection was warranted — regardless of whether the call he’s arguing was correct. But if Arenado uttered one of those words, he should have been tossed immediately. He wasn’t. The ejection didn’t come when he was in Libka’s face or even saying anything. It makes it a little harder to believe that what Arenado said would have triggered an ejection.

Finally, Libka didn’t do himself any favors by smirking immediately after ejecting Arenado, then again as Arenado resumed his argument and Cardinals manager Oliver Marmol came out to pick it up.

The whole chain of events left the baseball fans frustrated with Libka.

For those looking for humor, Arenado’s ejection came only moments after Cubs broadcaster Pat Hughes found out that he was being inducted into the team’s Hall of Fame. Several viewers found that funny.

Regarding the ejection, none of this looks good for Libka. The least frustrating element of the play from his point of view was the call itself. Missed calls are frustrating but we’ve seen a bunch from MLB umpires this season. That, in and of itself, is tolerable.

He should have appealed to first base. Then, he should have either ejected Arenado when he was yelling or opted against it. Ejecting Arenado after he’d cooled down (and with a smirk on his face) was just a bad look for Libka. There’s no way to defend that.

None of this is to say that Arenado is blameless. He’s not. He needed to do a better job of maintaining his composure. We’re in late August and his team is in a playoff race. He can’t be getting ejected.

But Libka’s handling of the situation was poor. One of the biggest frustrations with MLB umpires is that, too often, they appear to make themselves the show. Maybe that’s not what Libka was trying to do here. But it sure seems that way.

[Casey Drottar]

About Michael Dixon

About Michael:
-- Writer/editor for thecomeback.com and awfulannouncing.com.
-- Bay Area born and raised, currently living in the Indianapolis area.
-- Twitter:
@mfdixon1985 (personal).
@michaeldixonsports (work).
-- Email: mdixon@thecomeback.com
Send tips, corrections, comments and (respectful) disagreements to that email. Do the same with pizza recommendations, taco recommendations and Seinfeld quotes.