edgar martinez-baseball hall of fame-hall of fame results SEATTLE – OCTOBER 2: Edgar Martinez #11 of the Seattle Mariners waves to fans as he takes the field during a post game ceremony honoring his career as a Mariner after the game against the Seattle Mariners on October 2, 2004 at Safeco Field in Seattle, Washington. (Photo by Otto Greule Jr/Getty Images)

The votes are in (or at least postmarked) for the 2018 BBWAA Baseball Hall of Fame balloting, and although more public ballots will trickle in before the January 24 announcement of the results, Ryan Thibodaux’s ballot tracker has tallied more than enough votes for us to draw some conclusions.

With 159 ballots counted, or about 37.5 percent of the expected total, here’s what we have learned.

1. Cooperstown is likely to welcome a four-man BBWAA class in 2018

Though it’s too early to begin engraving plaques, four players appear destined to reach 75 percent of the BBWAA vote and join Modern Era Committee inductees Jack Morris and Alan Trammell on the Cooperstown stage next summer:

  • Unsurprisingly, Chipper Jones has appeared on 98.7 percent of all ballots, most of all candidates, meaning he will surely reach the Hall on his first try.
  • Jim Thome has been named on 94.3 percent of ballots, all but ensuring him first-ballot induction as well.
  • Vladimir Guerrero, who fell 15 votes short last year, stands at 93.7 percent and has already gained support from 30 voters who neglected him last year.
  • Trevor Hoffman has garnered support from 78.6 percent of voters, after falling five tallies shy last year. He has a net gain of nine votes already, and given that he has previously performed on private ballots, he’s all but a lock.

There is one more candidate with a shot at induction this year. We’ll get to him shortly.

2. Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens appear to be stalling out

Last year, arguably the biggest story in Hall voting was the rapid swell of support for Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens. But so far in this round of balloting, the steroid-tainted superstars seem to have hit a wall. Both stand just below 70 percent, but neither has netted a single new vote. Seeing as how both annually perform far worse on private ballots than public ones, they each appear headed back to the mid-50s purgatory they attained a year ago.

Joe Morgan’s letter to voters might be the most tempting explanation for Bonds and Clemens’ lack of progress, but there’s likely something else going on here: Players implicated in PED use could simply have a ceiling that won’t easily budge.

One of the reasons candidates tend to gain traction over their time on the ballot is that voters are confronted with new information. A stat about Mike Mussina or a testimonial about Larry Walker can swing a writer who’s on the fence about voting for those players. But the Bonds and Clemens arguments are so played-out and so picked-over that at this point maybe voters who have refused to vote for them simply can’t be swayed. Everyone has an opinion on steroids and the Hall of Fame and most people are loath to change their minds on the subject.

First-time voters will continue to help Bonds and Clemens (who each have four more years on the ballot after this one), but there simply might not be 75 percent of the electorate capable of coming around on them.

3. Advanced stats, particularly JAWS, seem to be making a big difference

Last year, in his eighth round of eligibility, Larry Walker appeared on 21.9 percent of ballots. This year he’s currently at 40.3 percent, having added 23 new voters (second most of any candidate, behind only Vlad). Some of that surge likely owes to the extra spot or two on their ballots voters have after electing three candidates last year. But some of it also likely owes to greater awareness of the case modern metrics make for the former Expos and Rockies outfielder.

Obviously advanced stats didn’t just pop up in the past year. But 2017 did mark the publication of Jay Jaffe’s “Cooperstown Casebook,” which leaned heavily on Jaffe’s JAWS system and included an essay in support of Walker’s candidacy. As the book circulated and Jaffe embarked on a publicity tour, JAWS seemed to sneak into more and more Hall conversations. That has benefited Walker, who ranks as the 10th most qualified right fielder of all-time according to the metric, as well as other analytic darlings.

As younger writers gain access to Hall of Fame votes and older writers continue to look into new-age metrics, expect players who grade out well via advanced stats to perform strongly in Hall voting. JAWS is not going away.

4. Johan Santana is not getting the respect he deserves

With only 2,000 innings pitched and low counting-stat totals, Johan Santana was always going to be a long-shot for Hall of Fame induction. But it seems silly that the two-time (should-have-been three-time) Cy Young winner has received only three votes (1.9 percent) and will likely fall off the ballot after only one year.

Given his soaring peak and short career, Santana sometimes draws statistical comparison to Sandy Koufax, and although that side-by-side falls apart when you consider Koufax’s remarkable World Series record, Johan stacks up favorably with another legendary Hall of Famer with a short-lived prime.

IP ERA ERA+ Strikeouts WAR JAWS W-L record
Dizzy Dean 1967 1/3 3.02 131 1,163 42.7 43.9 150-83
Johan Santana 2025 2/3 3.20 136 1,988 50.7 48.1 139-78

Dean won an MVP and twice finished second (in the pre-Cy Young days), while Santana captured a pair of Cy Youngs and finished in the top 5 three other times. These two are close, but it’s tough not to conclude Santana was a bit better, relative to his era.

That comparison alone won’t get Santana to the Hall; if being better than a Hall of Famer were grounds for induction, Cooperstown would need a much bigger plaque room. But the Santana-Dean side-by-side is instructive because it illustrates how voters have previously valued players who shined bright for a short period of time. Santana may or may not deserve Hall of Fame induction, but he definitely warrants a longer stay on the ballot.

5. Edgar Martinez is headed for induction — but probably not this year


The good news for Edgar Martinez’s legion of fans is that the former Mariners designated hitter is on track for a plaque in Cooperstown. The bad news for Edgar supporters is that he will almost certainly have to wait another year to claim it.

A year after surging to 58.6 percent of the vote, Martinez has so far been named on 80.5 percent of ballots, thanks to a net gain of 17 supporters. And although that sounds promising for the hitting savant in his penultimate year of BBWAA eligibility, he is almost certain to take a tumble when private ballots are added to public ones, as he has in past years. After falling short by 73 votes last year, he’s got too much room left to make up.

That said, if Edgar can come in at, say, 68 percent of the vote this cycle, he’ll be well positioned to reach the 75-percent threshold next year, when he will likely receive a final-year boost. As is so often the case with Hall voting, patience seems to be paying for Martinez and his fans.

About Alex Putterman

Alex is a writer and editor for The Comeback and Awful Announcing. He has written for The Atlantic, VICE Sports, MLB.com, SI.com and more. He is a proud alum of Northwestern University and The Daily Northwestern. You can find him on Twitter @AlexPutterman.

4 thoughts on “5 takeaways from Baseball Hall of Fame exit polls

  1. Um, for the uninitiated (i.e. me) what in the blue blazes is JAWS? I know that I’m old school (even at 45), but using these “advanced metrics” creates a slippery slope. I like Larry Walker and think he was a tremendous player, but in my opinion, he’s not an HOF’er, even if JAWS says he is. (And before anyone responds, I know that “Jaws” was a very good movie directed by Steven Spielberg. It is not, however, a newly “discovered” advanced metric that presumably is as good, if not better than the sainted WAR.)

    1. Agreed. WAR and JAWS are flawed, biased, useful. As many people say, if you use WAR or JAWS as a major argument for the Hall, that player doesn’t deserve to be in the Hall.

  2. Edgar Martinez has been hurt by not playing defence (and WAR, nor JAWS, don’t come close to measuring defence at all, especially for a no-D player). He’s also been hurt by snarky Seattle fans, many of whom have been quite rude.

    Hoffman is simply a really good long snapper. So what if he was a great pinch hitter, he wasn’t good enough to pitch in more than an inning or 2 two to three times week. I’d say the same about. Rivera Being a great long snapper or pinch hitter is the same as a great closer, it means you aren’t good enough to pitch to 7+ batters, not good enough to pitch in 3+ innings, not good enough to start. Not good enough to matter.

    Some argue Walker has been hurt by playing in Denver, and that pitchers who pitch in pitcher-friendly parks haven’t been dinged. Uh, Walker’s Home road splits are hurting his cause, Home of .348/.431/.637 215 HR, road of .278/.370/.495 168 HR; that’s huge. It wouldn’t bother me to see him in the Hall but it’s splits that kill him, not “playing in Denver”. And what pitcher has 2.98 ERA, 1.03 WHIP, 1587 K’s, and 9.5K/9 ratios at home but 4.28 ERA, 1.65 WHIP, 887 K’s and 7.4K/9 ratios on the road??

Comments are closed.